ChemKru
All about Chemical Engineering
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
ECONOMICAL OPTIONS FOR RECOVERING NGL / LPG AT LNG RECEIVING TERMINALS Part 5
Thursday, December 9, 2010
ECONOMICAL OPTIONS FOR RECOVERING NGL / LPG AT LNG RECEIVING TERMINALS Part 4
TRADITIONAL GAS PROCESSING
Over the past 30 years, Ortloff has developed a number of processes for efficient recovery of hydrocarbon liquids from natural gas and other gas streams. These processes offer many advantages over other processes available to gas processors, including higher recovery, better efficiency, greater simplicity, and better reliability.
These processes typically involve cooling an inlet gas stream prior to work expansion of the stream to provide some or all of the refrigeration required for the process. For rich gas streams, external refrigeration may also be applied in addition to the refrigeration provided by the turboexpander. The power recovered by the turboexpander is typically used to provide partial recompression of the residue gas stream following separation of the lighter and heavier components in a distillation column. Reflux streams appropriate for the type of product recovery required are provided to the distillation column. These reflux streams overcome the vapor-liquid equilibrium effects that limit the recovery potential of many processes. A typical gas processing scheme that can be used for both LPG and NGL recovery is shown in Figure 3 below.
These processes have been successfully used in plants as small as 10 MMSCFD and as large as 2,100 MMSCFD. This size range brackets the processing capacity of all re-gasification facilities that are presently in existence, in the design phase, or under construction. Further, the processing conditions around typical gas plant demethanizers/deethanizers are essentially the same as those used for LNG fractionation columns. So, although LNG fractionation has not yet been practiced on an industrial scale, the separation technology involved is well proven.
ECONOMICAL OPTIONS FOR RECOVERING NGL / LPG AT LNG RECEIVING TERMINALS Part 3
ECONOMICAL OPTIONS FOR RECOVERING NGL / LPG AT LNG RECEIVING TERMINALS
LNG (liquefied natural gas) receiving terminals have been designed and built at many locations around the world for storing and vaporizing LNG cargos for delivery to existing pipeline infrastructures. The composition and heating value of the vaporized LNG sent to pipeline is determined by the properties of the LNG produced at the source. Since most pipeline contracts specify a range of acceptable heating values for gas delivered into a particular market, the variability of the inlet cargo properties can be a problem. In many instances, the heating value of LNG shipped to market is higher than acceptable in a specific pipeline grid. Some options available to reduce the heating value include: blending with other gas streams; injecting an inert gas (typically nitrogen) into the vaporized stream; or vaporizing the rich LNG stream and sending it to a conventional NGL / LPG (natural gas liquids / liquefied petroleum gas) recovery plant for processing prior to flowing to the pipeline grid.
In most cases, there is not an abundance of natural gas available for blending to adequately lower the heating value of a rich LNG stream. Nitrogen injection is usually very expensive and generally provides no other economic benefit besides lowering the heating value of the sales stream. Also, there are usually specifications covering total inert content which may not allow enough nitrogen
injection to adequately lower the heating value. Vaporization of the gas stream and then processing in a conventional gas plant does provide the economic advantage of selling the higher value heavier components separately (i.e., typical gas plant economics), but generally at a high operating cost. When LNG is vaporized, heated, and then processed in a conventional gas plant, a significant amount of compression is required to re-refrigerate the gas (via expansion) in order to recover the hydrocarbon components and then re-inject the residue gas at pipeline pressure.
A better method for controlling the delivery heating value is to recover NGL or LPG by integrating the recovery step into the vaporization step, eliminating the need for re-compression and taking advantage of the refrigeration available in the LNG. This provides the lowest capital and operating cost alternative for controlling heating value, while also providing a significant additional revenue stream.
In most LNG liquefaction plants, heavy hydrocarbon removal (generally C5+) is considered a feed conditioning step for the liquefaction process, so the resultant LNG will contain most of the hydrocarbon components lighter than pentane. For more than 30 years, Ortloff has been developing technology for recovering liquids from natural gas that offers higher recovery, better efficiency, greater simplicity, and better reliability than other available processes. This natural gas liquids recovery
technology can be extended to allow efficient liquids recovery in LNG terminals through integration of the recovery step with the re-vaporization step.
The Ortloff LNG Fractionation Processes (LFP) eliminate the need for recompression in the liquids recovery step, reducing the overall power required by as much as 90% or more compared to processing in a conventional gas plant. An additional benefit of LFP is that process performance is not sensitive to changes in inlet LNG composition, providing the terminal operator with maximum flexibility in processing LNG cargos from essentially anywhere in the world. This paper presents the results of case studies conducted by Ortloff to determine the recovery and efficiency performance of
the LFP liquids recovery technology when applied to a typical LNG feedstock.
Krunal Yuvaraj Bhosale
Chemical Engineer
ECONOMICAL OPTIONS FOR RECOVERING NGL / LPG AT LNG RECEIVING TERMINALS
A number of LNG receiving terminals are now in the planning or construction phases around the world. Many of these new terminals will be sited in highly industrialized nations where a significant infrastructure already exists for utilizing lighter liquid hydrocarbons (ethane and propane)as feedstock for chemicals production and fuel usage. This provides a strong economic incentive for recovering these components from the LNG prior to vaporization, with the added benefit of making the resulting gas more compatible with existing gas transmission pipelines by reducing its heating value.
Fractionation to separate the heavier hydrocarbons from the methane in LNG has not yet been practiced on an industrial scale. Nevertheless, the concepts involved are much the same as those that have been employed in cryogenic NGL and LPG recovery plants for decades. As such, extension of this more familiar "gas plant" technology to LNG fractionation provides significant economic benefit for the receiving terminal while adding very little project risk.
Ortloff has developed a number of processing schemes for efficient fractionation of LNG to produce NGL and/or LPG. The optimum processing scheme generally depends on several factors, including the desired product slate, the value of the products compared to the value of natural gas and the cost of energy, and the receiving and delivery conditions. In many LNG terminals, design parameters for existing pumping and vaporization equipment are also important constraints on the process design. This paper presents examples and discusses the relative merits of these new processing schemes.
Monday, December 6, 2010
Kinetics of Fluid-Fluid Reactions
1. To produce a particular product
2. To separate a constituent from a fluid.
Based upon fluids involved in such reaction we have:
a. Gas.liquid reaction
b. Liquid.liquid reaction
Examples of fluid fluid reactions that are aimed at production of a desired product are:
i. Pretation of chlorobenzene by reaction of gaseous chlorine with liquid benzene... Gas liquid reaction
ii. Formation of soaps by action of aqueous alkalies on fatty acids or fats... liquid liquid reaction
iii. Nitration of organic compounds with aqueous nitric acid... Liquid liquid reaction
iv. Production of ammonium nitrate by action of ammonia on aqueous nitric acid... Gas liquid reaction
Examples of fluid fluid reactions that are carried out to separate a constituent from a fluid are:
i. Nitric acid by absorption of nitric oxide in water... Gas liquid reaction
ii. Removal of CO2 from has mixture using aqueous solutions of potassium carbonate or monoethanolamine
iii. Sulphur removal from petroleum fractions by aqueous ethanolamines... Liquid liquid reaction.